An adversary searches a targeted web site for web services that have not been publicized. This attack can be especially dangerous since unpublished but available services may not have adequate security controls placed upon them given that an administrator may believe they are unreachable.
Typical Severity
Low
Relationships
This table shows the other attack patterns and high level categories that are related to this attack pattern. These relationships are defined as ChildOf and ParentOf, and give insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition, relationships such as CanFollow, PeerOf, and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar attack patterns that the user may want to explore.
Nature
Type
ID
Name
ChildOf
Standard Attack Pattern - A standard level attack pattern in CAPEC is focused on a specific methodology or technique used in an attack. It is often seen as a singular piece of a fully executed attack. A standard attack pattern is meant to provide sufficient details to understand the specific technique and how it attempts to accomplish a desired goal. A standard level attack pattern is a specific type of a more abstract meta level attack pattern.
Find target web site: An adversary finds a target web site that they think may have unpublicized web services
Map the published web site: The adversary will map the published web site either by using an automated tool or by manually accessing well-known debugging or logging pages, or otherwise predictable pages within the site tree
Techniques
Use Dirbuster to brute force directories and file names to find unpublicized web services
Find a pattern in the naming of documents and extrapolate this pattern to discover additional documents that have been created but are no longer externally linked
Experiment
Try to find weaknesses or information: The adversary will try to find weaknesses in the unpublicized services that the targeted site did not intend to be public
Techniques
Use Nikto to look for web service vulnerabilities
Exploit
Follow-up attack: Use any information or weaknesses found to carry out a follow-up attack
Prerequisites
The targeted web site must include unpublished services within its web tree. The nature of these services determines the severity of this attack.
Resources Required
Spidering tools to explore the target web site are extremely useful in this attack especially when attacking large sites. Some tools might also be able to automatically construct common service queries from known paths.
Related Weaknesses
A Related Weakness relationship associates a weakness with this attack pattern. Each association implies a weakness that must exist for a given attack to be successful. If multiple weaknesses are associated with the attack pattern, then any of the weaknesses (but not necessarily all) may be present for the attack to be successful. Each related weakness is identified by a CWE identifier.
CAPEC mappings to ATT&CK techniques leverage an inheritance model to streamline and minimize direct CAPEC/ATT&CK mappings. Inheritance of a mapping is indicated by text stating that the parent CAPEC has relevant ATT&CK mappings. Note that the ATT&CK Enterprise Framework does not use an inheritance model as part of the mapping to CAPEC.
Relevant to the ATT&CK taxonomy mapping (see
parent
)
Content History
Submissions
Submission Date
Submitter
Organization
2014-06-23
(Version 2.6)
CAPEC Content Team
The MITRE Corporation
Modifications
Modification Date
Modifier
Organization
2015-12-07
(Version 2.8)
CAPEC Content Team
The MITRE Corporation
Updated Related_Attack_Patterns
2019-09-30
(Version 3.2)
CAPEC Content Team
The MITRE Corporation
Updated Related_Attack_Patterns
2020-07-30
(Version 3.3)
CAPEC Content Team
The MITRE Corporation
Updated Related_Attack_Patterns
2021-10-21
(Version 3.6)
CAPEC Content Team
The MITRE Corporation
Updated Description, Execution_Flow
2023-01-24
(Version 3.9)
CAPEC Content Team
The MITRE Corporation
Updated Related_Weaknesses
More information is available — Please select a different filter.